<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short, longer, long &#8212; a better-than-nothing compromise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Brides!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never teh Bride</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-156583</link>
		<dc:creator>Never teh Bride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 20:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/#comment-156583</guid>
		<description>Ahahahaha, now I can&#039;t look at pic 3 without imagining that it&#039;s a huge embellished condom. Beaded for her pleasure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahahahaha, now I can&#8217;t look at pic 3 without imagining that it&#8217;s a huge embellished condom. Beaded for her pleasure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: satori</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-156577</link>
		<dc:creator>satori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/#comment-156577</guid>
		<description>Ew, I *hate* the condom-sleeve in picture 3! Nice to have options, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ew, I *hate* the condom-sleeve in picture 3! Nice to have options, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-156571</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/#comment-156571</guid>
		<description>I agree, they are fine on someone who already looks good in a strapless dress, but they really have no added benefit for those who want to cover their arms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, they are fine on someone who already looks good in a strapless dress, but they really have no added benefit for those who want to cover their arms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/comment-page-1/#comment-156558</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/2008/02/01/short-longer-long-a-workable-compromise/#comment-156558</guid>
		<description>I dunno - my girlfriend and I were looking for dresses for her on DB&#039;s website and saw this too.  It&#039;s better than nothing, but, well, they kinda *look* tacked-on.  And sheer white fabric is not going to flatter *anyone* who&#039;s looking to hide lumpy-squishies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno &#8211; my girlfriend and I were looking for dresses for her on DB&#8217;s website and saw this too.  It&#8217;s better than nothing, but, well, they kinda *look* tacked-on.  And sheer white fabric is not going to flatter *anyone* who&#8217;s looking to hide lumpy-squishies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

