<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Oh Why Tornai?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Brides!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:25:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lissa</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-438483</link>
		<dc:creator>lissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-438483</guid>
		<description>i think the champaign one with the emerald sequence is beautiful. i wouldn&#039;t buy it for that price. i would remake it my own and not use see through fabric but a champaign lace instead. when i get married, hopefully i can try to make one like that one. but it is pretty. like a fairytale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the champaign one with the emerald sequence is beautiful. i wouldn&#8217;t buy it for that price. i would remake it my own and not use see through fabric but a champaign lace instead. when i get married, hopefully i can try to make one like that one. but it is pretty. like a fairytale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sugatek</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-424898</link>
		<dc:creator>Sugatek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-424898</guid>
		<description>I agree, Pnina can be over the top sometimes, but I also think she has some beautiful dresses as well.  I watch SYTTD often and if you do and saw the dress that Bridal Consultant Sarah selected, it was a Pnina...fitted, but classy and GORGEOUS!  You can&#039;t show 5 dresses to define a person&#039;s collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Pnina can be over the top sometimes, but I also think she has some beautiful dresses as well.  I watch SYTTD often and if you do and saw the dress that Bridal Consultant Sarah selected, it was a Pnina&#8230;fitted, but classy and GORGEOUS!  You can&#8217;t show 5 dresses to define a person&#8217;s collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beeble</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-415556</link>
		<dc:creator>beeble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-415556</guid>
		<description>On the Television Without Pity board for &quot;Say Yes to the Dress,&quot; they refer to her designs as the &quot;stripper fairy&quot; look. Only one bride on SYTTD rocked her design well, it was Dorianne who lined the bodice of one of her designs and wore a beautiful birdcage veil with it. Other Pnini brides look awful especially in a church setting. The dresses are designed for Vegas showgirls not brides getting married in places of worship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Television Without Pity board for &#8220;Say Yes to the Dress,&#8221; they refer to her designs as the &#8220;stripper fairy&#8221; look. Only one bride on SYTTD rocked her design well, it was Dorianne who lined the bodice of one of her designs and wore a beautiful birdcage veil with it. Other Pnini brides look awful especially in a church setting. The dresses are designed for Vegas showgirls not brides getting married in places of worship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La BellaDonna</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-415103</link>
		<dc:creator>La BellaDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-415103</guid>
		<description>Oh, left out my HOWEVER - HOWEVER, if she&#039;s going to construct a garment with seams in a sheer fabric, she&#039;d do better to join them with galloon or entre-deux or passementerie of some sort - those seams in the bottom dress are NOT attractive, and could have been avoided - and should have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, left out my HOWEVER &#8211; HOWEVER, if she&#8217;s going to construct a garment with seams in a sheer fabric, she&#8217;d do better to join them with galloon or entre-deux or passementerie of some sort &#8211; those seams in the bottom dress are NOT attractive, and could have been avoided &#8211; and should have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La BellaDonna</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-415102</link>
		<dc:creator>La BellaDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-415102</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll give the designer this: the dresses, by and large, seem to be imaginative, VERY well-constructed, and frequently very pretty.  The overall impression I get, somehow, is that the designer got her start designing for Costume Cons.  No, I wouldn&#039;t wear something see-through for my wedding gown - or, come to think of it, EVER - but  thirty years ago, I would have liked one of those gowns.  I don&#039;t know where I would have worn it, but I would have liked to own #1 or #3 (although I&#039;d have to shift the poufiness on #3 - the waist needs to be higher, or the poufs draped narrower, for me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll give the designer this: the dresses, by and large, seem to be imaginative, VERY well-constructed, and frequently very pretty.  The overall impression I get, somehow, is that the designer got her start designing for Costume Cons.  No, I wouldn&#8217;t wear something see-through for my wedding gown &#8211; or, come to think of it, EVER &#8211; but  thirty years ago, I would have liked one of those gowns.  I don&#8217;t know where I would have worn it, but I would have liked to own #1 or #3 (although I&#8217;d have to shift the poufiness on #3 &#8211; the waist needs to be higher, or the poufs draped narrower, for me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blossom</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-414887</link>
		<dc:creator>Blossom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-414887</guid>
		<description>To me it looks like she has stuck a big poffy skirt on the bottom of some sexy lingure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it looks like she has stuck a big poffy skirt on the bottom of some sexy lingure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosanna</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-414859</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-414859</guid>
		<description>Well, many clergy members don&#039;t seem to have a problem marrying women whose dresses are form fitting (when not frankly showing too much in the &quot;upper department&quot;) so what about these gowns you don&#039;t like? They are excessive, all right, but the &quot;sexy bride&quot; school of thought is alive and kicking, as well as the &quot;princess bride&quot; and the &quot;modest bride&quot;. The one that is sorely missing is the thinking bride... most are pushed by relatives, fiancees, wedding planners and fashion stylists to wear gowns that don&#039;t make them look good just because somebody else has an expectation of how a bride &quot;should look&quot;. I&#039;ll tell you how a bride should look: she should look like HERSELF, whatever that means (if she is trashy, that&#039;s how it is appropriate for her to look!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, many clergy members don&#8217;t seem to have a problem marrying women whose dresses are form fitting (when not frankly showing too much in the &#8220;upper department&#8221;) so what about these gowns you don&#8217;t like? They are excessive, all right, but the &#8220;sexy bride&#8221; school of thought is alive and kicking, as well as the &#8220;princess bride&#8221; and the &#8220;modest bride&#8221;. The one that is sorely missing is the thinking bride&#8230; most are pushed by relatives, fiancees, wedding planners and fashion stylists to wear gowns that don&#8217;t make them look good just because somebody else has an expectation of how a bride &#8220;should look&#8221;. I&#8217;ll tell you how a bride should look: she should look like HERSELF, whatever that means (if she is trashy, that&#8217;s how it is appropriate for her to look!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-414829</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-414829</guid>
		<description>The second one is *especially* awful, because it can&#039;t make up its mind about where the waist is. The boning part goes over a waist which doesn&#039;t look like a natural part of the skirt. The first one at least has embellishments that segue from the top to the bottom. The second looks like a pair of granny-briefs is being worn under it.

As it is - ugh. The translucent ones look like fancy undergarments that a wedding dress should be going *over*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second one is *especially* awful, because it can&#8217;t make up its mind about where the waist is. The boning part goes over a waist which doesn&#8217;t look like a natural part of the skirt. The first one at least has embellishments that segue from the top to the bottom. The second looks like a pair of granny-briefs is being worn under it.</p>
<p>As it is &#8211; ugh. The translucent ones look like fancy undergarments that a wedding dress should be going *over*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Never teh Bride</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-414817</link>
		<dc:creator>Never teh Bride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-414817</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s a nut... a nut, I tell you! Though I still can&#039;t help liking the black and white gown &lt;a href=&quot;http://manolobrides.com/2008/07/02/pnina-tornai-in-two-sentences-or-less/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in this post&lt;/a&gt;. Not sure what it is about her and the sheer panels, though. I could do without seeing the bride&#039;s bellybutton, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s a nut&#8230; a nut, I tell you! Though I still can&#8217;t help liking the black and white gown <a href="http://manolobrides.com/2008/07/02/pnina-tornai-in-two-sentences-or-less/" rel="nofollow">in this post</a>. Not sure what it is about her and the sheer panels, though. I could do without seeing the bride&#8217;s bellybutton, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twistie</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2009/11/07/why-oh-why-tornai/comment-page-1/#comment-414807</link>
		<dc:creator>Twistie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=3430#comment-414807</guid>
		<description>@Margo: I do believe you&#039;re right. In fact, if she turned around, I think we could see precisely where the pinch is. Perhaps that&#039;s why she&#039;s so fond of all that sheer fabric in the bodice?

@Kate the Bride: While I think Say Yes to the Dress is partly responsible for making Ms. Torani&#039;s designs yet more popular, she seemed pretty established before the show, and her designs have also popped up to much oohing and ahing on shows like Whose Wedding Is It, Anyway?; Rich Bride, Poor Bride; and Bridezillas. I think the conspiracy reaches beyond Kleinfelds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Margo: I do believe you&#8217;re right. In fact, if she turned around, I think we could see precisely where the pinch is. Perhaps that&#8217;s why she&#8217;s so fond of all that sheer fabric in the bodice?</p>
<p>@Kate the Bride: While I think Say Yes to the Dress is partly responsible for making Ms. Torani&#8217;s designs yet more popular, she seemed pretty established before the show, and her designs have also popped up to much oohing and ahing on shows like Whose Wedding Is It, Anyway?; Rich Bride, Poor Bride; and Bridezillas. I think the conspiracy reaches beyond Kleinfelds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

