<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Too Feminine? (or There&#8217;s a Guy In Here Somewhere)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manolobrides.com/2010/02/22/too-feminine-or-theres-a-guy-in-here-somewhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manolobrides.com/2010/02/22/too-feminine-or-theres-a-guy-in-here-somewhere/</link>
	<description>Manolo Loves the Brides!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:59:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben the groom</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2010/02/22/too-feminine-or-theres-a-guy-in-here-somewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-436750</link>
		<dc:creator>ben the groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=4556#comment-436750</guid>
		<description>Great post! Yea no matter how hard the groom works it seems its a brides affair, but even for me, a groom getting involved, its ok.  It&#039;s one of the grooms jobs to make sure her universe is orbiting just the way she wants!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Yea no matter how hard the groom works it seems its a brides affair, but even for me, a groom getting involved, its ok.  It&#8217;s one of the grooms jobs to make sure her universe is orbiting just the way she wants!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2010/02/22/too-feminine-or-theres-a-guy-in-here-somewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-436696</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=4556#comment-436696</guid>
		<description>In my 28 years of producing wedding videos I&#039;ve had a few where the groom actually did most of the planning, decorating, venue selection, etc.  We often hear the term bridecilla.  Can you say groomzilla?  I&#039;ve met a few.

Grooms should be encouraged to take a more active role in the wedding planning process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my 28 years of producing wedding videos I&#8217;ve had a few where the groom actually did most of the planning, decorating, venue selection, etc.  We often hear the term bridecilla.  Can you say groomzilla?  I&#8217;ve met a few.</p>
<p>Grooms should be encouraged to take a more active role in the wedding planning process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monkeyparts</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2010/02/22/too-feminine-or-theres-a-guy-in-here-somewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-433525</link>
		<dc:creator>monkeyparts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=4556#comment-433525</guid>
		<description>oooooohhhh, my husband-to-be has FIRM ideas about what our wedding will be like.  And after a happy decade together, I was shocked by the proposal and happy to let him make a lot of decisions - he&#039;d already picked out the place, date, music, ring-maker, officiant, etc.

Which is really unusual.  We generally do lots of talking, processing and vascillating before making big changes - but somehow he got swept up in wedding fever.  I think that&#039;s key - the excitement brings energy to opinions.  As I&#039;ve gotten more used to the idea, I&#039;ve gotten more excited and have started to exert more influence on the planning - but it definitely is not a very &quot;feminine&quot; ceremony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oooooohhhh, my husband-to-be has FIRM ideas about what our wedding will be like.  And after a happy decade together, I was shocked by the proposal and happy to let him make a lot of decisions &#8211; he&#8217;d already picked out the place, date, music, ring-maker, officiant, etc.</p>
<p>Which is really unusual.  We generally do lots of talking, processing and vascillating before making big changes &#8211; but somehow he got swept up in wedding fever.  I think that&#8217;s key &#8211; the excitement brings energy to opinions.  As I&#8217;ve gotten more used to the idea, I&#8217;ve gotten more excited and have started to exert more influence on the planning &#8211; but it definitely is not a very &#8220;feminine&#8221; ceremony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La BellaDonna</title>
		<link>http://manolobrides.com/2010/02/22/too-feminine-or-theres-a-guy-in-here-somewhere/comment-page-1/#comment-433506</link>
		<dc:creator>La BellaDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manolobrides.com/?p=4556#comment-433506</guid>
		<description>NtB: I agree with you absolutely; I had a groom who was very interested in and involved in even minute aspects of our wedding ... except, of course, the work involved.  Most of THAT was left to me to deal with.  (And I have to confess that, even at the time, it didn&#039;t strike me as odd; it took YEARS for me to see that it a) wasn&#039;t fair; and b) was symptomatic of our relationship.)

That unhappy little squib aside, I think most people assume that a marriage is the joining of two lives, and surely the wedding should reflect that?  Unfortunately, the WEDDING generally reflects a much older assumption: This is the one day where the BRIDE gets to shine, because the rest of her marriage is going to be devoted to her husband and/or her family.  This is the one occasion where the bride&#039;s wishes will be considered important.

Not that that isn&#039;t an unhappy little squib in its own right, also!  I think if most brides were asked if that was truly what they expected to occur after marriage (that is, the wedding is the one day/wife subordinate ever after, etc., etc.), there would be a lot of appalled and resounding &quot;NOs!&quot;  However, that doesn&#039;t mean there aren&#039;t many people (brides-to-be and grooms-to-be alike) who DO have that subconscious expectation - which is why a lot of Princess Brides don&#039;t get backed down from some of their unreasonable expectations for their One Big Day.

If it were viewed, instead, as a celebration of two lives joining, surely it should reflect the preferences of both of those people, rather than one running roughshod over the other - and both people should be involved in the work of planning, as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NtB: I agree with you absolutely; I had a groom who was very interested in and involved in even minute aspects of our wedding &#8230; except, of course, the work involved.  Most of THAT was left to me to deal with.  (And I have to confess that, even at the time, it didn&#8217;t strike me as odd; it took YEARS for me to see that it a) wasn&#8217;t fair; and b) was symptomatic of our relationship.)</p>
<p>That unhappy little squib aside, I think most people assume that a marriage is the joining of two lives, and surely the wedding should reflect that?  Unfortunately, the WEDDING generally reflects a much older assumption: This is the one day where the BRIDE gets to shine, because the rest of her marriage is going to be devoted to her husband and/or her family.  This is the one occasion where the bride&#8217;s wishes will be considered important.</p>
<p>Not that that isn&#8217;t an unhappy little squib in its own right, also!  I think if most brides were asked if that was truly what they expected to occur after marriage (that is, the wedding is the one day/wife subordinate ever after, etc., etc.), there would be a lot of appalled and resounding &#8220;NOs!&#8221;  However, that doesn&#8217;t mean there aren&#8217;t many people (brides-to-be and grooms-to-be alike) who DO have that subconscious expectation &#8211; which is why a lot of Princess Brides don&#8217;t get backed down from some of their unreasonable expectations for their One Big Day.</p>
<p>If it were viewed, instead, as a celebration of two lives joining, surely it should reflect the preferences of both of those people, rather than one running roughshod over the other &#8211; and both people should be involved in the work of planning, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

